Red Velvet's Win On Inkigayo Doesn't Brand Sense?


#1 nominees on Inkigayo were Naul, Red Velvet, in addition to Melomance. Red Velvet won #1 yesteryear having a sum Youtube marker (3500). BTS' 'Mic Drop' wasn't nominated.



Youtube views from November 26 6PM to December iii 6PM:
BTS: 22,698,140
Red Velvet: 5,891,966

The Youtube scores should've been:
BTS: 3500 (full score)
Red Velvet: 908

The sum scores for #1 nominees should've been:
Naul: 5916
Red Velvet: 5703
Melomance: 4990

Conclusion:
1) BTS should've been nominated since they charted inside transcend 150 on Gaon.
2) Even if BTS wasn't nominated, Naul should've won #1, non Red Velvet.

-

Pann: Please scope a feedback to Red Velvet's win on Inkigayo

1. [+202, -6] To those who are claiming that they exclusively count songs inside transcend xxx - BTS' results for this calendar week are much ameliorate than concluding week's. They were #6 concluding calendar week already. I don't convey problems amongst Red Velvet winning #1 precisely goal coming upwardly amongst nonsense.

2. [+189, -9] It is weird. They would've won #1 exclusively amongst BTS' Youtube marker in addition to Twice/Black Pink's popularity.

3. [+167, -8] BTS' results for this calendar week are ameliorate than concluding week... And since when did they e'er tell they exclusively regard transcend 30?

4. [+94, -2] The OP isn't proverb that BTS should've won #1. They're proverb that Red Velvet could never larn a sum Youtube marker because BTS' Youtube views are a wall. Therefore, Naul should've won #1.

5. [+87, -2] Right forthwith all of the online communities are going crazy in addition to calling it a manipulation. Inkigayo needs to scope a feedback.

6. [+78, -1] I'm certain this is written yesteryear a Naul fan. Naul fans are already going crazy on other sites. How tin you lot tell that this is written yesteryear an Army?

0 Response to "Red Velvet's Win On Inkigayo Doesn't Brand Sense?"

Post a Comment